AP Photo
|
Years of alcohol
research demonstrates the following:
↑ alcohol availability → ↑ alcohol sales →
↑ consumption → ↑alcohol related problems and harm → ↑health, enforcement, and other costs
A quick
look at British Columbia, where this exact model of combined
government and private retailing of alcohol was implemented shows just how
unsuccessful it has been, particularly in terms of the overall impact on
health. In a letter to the editor of the
Toronto Star, researchers from the Centre
for Addictions Research of BC and the Centre
for Addiction and Mental Health also had the following to say about the
OCSA’s economic argument:
“Private
stores will in fact compete with government stores and so take away sales
thereby reducing both government revenue and LCBO jobs...Alcohol is not an
ordinary commodity. Every step towards privatization weakens the community’s
ability to limit alcohol-related harm through regulation of price and
availability.”
Not only
did the majority of Kingston respondents in a recent alcohol survey not want
alcohol expanded to corner stores, local compliance rates for selling tobacco
to minors raise concerns about how well they will be able to control alcohol
sales to youth. A recent compliance check
revealed that 15% of the 150 tobacco retailers checked in KFL&A sold
tobacco to a 17 year old youth shopper.
No comments:
Post a Comment